[Doc-SIG] autogenerating API docs using sphinx

Ondrej Certik ondrej at certik.cz
Tue Apr 15 11:34:39 CEST 2008


On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Gael Varoquaux
<gael.varoquaux at normalesup.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:16:34PM -0500, skip at pobox.com wrote:
>
>  > Would it perhaps be better to create a Sphinx backend for an existing
>  > source-to-documentation tool like doxygen?  I have no idea how hard or
>  > feasible that would be or if there are better candidate tools.  Doxygen just
>  > happens to be one I am grudingly familiar with because the C++ programmers
>  > at work use it.  If successful it would have the added benefit of exposing
>  > Sphinx and restructured text outside the Python world.
>
>  That would be great, but it wouldn't replace what I am doing. I have
>  taylored in my autogeneration of docs a lot of smart guessing (special
>  cases for my module?) to have a usable and readable doc generated. I hate
>  the docs generated by tools like doxygen. They are just not meant for end
>  users, but for programmers.
>
>  Two purposes, two tools; fair enough.

Yep. I myself am looking for something that Gael is doing -- simple
API docs for endusers (and myself too!), that quickly shows me, what
kind of stuff I can do. For everything else, I can either use epydoc,
or just look into the sources directly (that's what I prefer).

Ondrej


More information about the Doc-SIG mailing list