[Doc-SIG] Undocumented modules

[skip@mojam.com (Skip Montanaro)]

    Fred> skip@mojam.com writes:
    >> What's wrong with the old (1.5.1?) version of the posixpath documentation?
    >> Did it change so much between 1.5.1 and 1.5.2 that it has to be rewritten?
    >> I must be missing something pretty basic.

    Fred>   'fraid so:  It's all listed under posixpath.  ;-)  The new docs
    Fred> are for os.path (it's still in the file .../libposixpath.tex).  This
    Fred> makes more sense for more people, and better encourages the cross-
    Fred> platform usage.

So all that's needed is to rename the TeX file and twiddle some words?