[Distutils] status check on PEP 517
Alex Grönholm
alex.gronholm at nextday.fi
Sat Jul 29 17:50:43 EDT 2017
Daniel Holth kirjoitti 30.07.2017 klo 00:48:
>
> I think the proposal is that flit depends on click depends on flit and
> neither one has a wheel and must be built from sdists. Then you have a
> circular build problem. So don't do that. I put this in the same
> category as accidentally conflicting with a stdlib module; it is
> confusing when it happens but it's also fairly avoidable.
>
Sure but vendorizing the dependencies would work around the problem,
yes? Like how setuptools does?
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017, 17:38 Alex Grönholm <alex.gronholm at nextday.fi
> <mailto:alex.gronholm at nextday.fi>> wrote:
>
> Donald Stufft kirjoitti 29.07.2017 klo 23:47:
>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com
>>> <mailto:njs at pobox.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I guess the most obvious example of when this would occur is:
>>> suppose click switches to using flit for builds, and then flit
>>> switches to using click for command line parsing. Now there's a
>>> bit of a chicken and egg problem where 'pip install click' will
>>> end up importing flit with the click source tree on the path,
>>> and this tree of course contains a directory named 'click', so
>>> unless special measures are taken flit will end up importing the
>>> code it's trying to build.
>>>
>>> But of course this can happen for lots of reasons; most packages
>>> have names that you wouldn't expect to randomly encounter at the
>>> root of a source tree very often, but with 100,000+ packages on
>>> pypi I expect it will happen eventually.
>>>
>>> This doesn't happen with setuptools because setuptools
>>> traditionally has few or no dependencies, but obviously we're
>>> changing that; the whole idea here is that now your build system
>>> has full access to pypi.
>>
>>
>> This is something to be discouraged anyways, because it creates a
>> sort of broken situation (the same situation that setuptools
>> itself had). The problem is that if you’re starting from only
>> sdists, you have a circular dependency that cannot be broken. You
>> can’t build click, because click requires flit, but you can’t
>> install flit, because flit requires click. The only way to fix
>> this is to either have an already built wheel that you can use
>> (which obviously was either built with a flit that didn’t require
>> click, or a click that didn’t require flit, or it’s provenance
>> can be traced back to that) or do some hacks that will hopefully
>> resolve the situation good enough to get your first wheel built.
>>
>> Setuptools tried to depend on things, and it broke shit for a lot
>> of people because of this. You basically can’t depend on anything
>> as a build system that uses you as a build system. You can only
>> depend on things that use other, different build systems in the
>> entire dependency tree. Likely the best thing for build systems
>> to do is either have no dependencies, or to have minimal
>> dependencies that promise to only use setuptools (or another
>> build tool, which one doesn’t matter, just as long as it has no
>> dependencies) forever (and have setuptools or this other build
>> tool promise to never take a dependency).
> Or vendorize their dependencies? To me it seems unrealistic for a
> build system to have no dependencies at all. Or perhaps this is
> exactly what you meant :)
>
>>
>> —
>> Donald Stufft
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Distutils-SIG maillist -Distutils-SIG at python.org <mailto:Distutils-SIG at python.org>
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG at python.org
> <mailto:Distutils-SIG at python.org>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20170730/dc2cb0d4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list