[Distutils] PyPI pull request

Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Mon Oct 28 12:29:11 CET 2013


Like Noah said, it’s just an internal name to make it easier to talk about the
web application portion of PyPI so we don’t have to say pypi the web app
vs PyPI the service/website.

I thought the name was funny :( You put packages in a Warehouse :3

On Oct 28, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Noah Kantrowitz <noah at coderanger.net> wrote:

> Warehouse is the internal project name, and will be just one software component of the service collectively known as PyPI. That said, Donald started it so by law of the jungle he can call it whatever he wants as long as I don't get phone calls from the FBI.
> 
> --Noah
> 
> On Oct 27, 2013, at 10:02 PM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I mean that the name CheeseShop has more human touch in it than Warehouse.
>> --
>> anatoly t.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Richard Jones <r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what you mean by it sounding "enterprisey" except perhaps just
>>> the name?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 28 October 2013 10:58, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Warehouse sounds very enterprisey. Any Roadmap for that, estimate time
>>>> to become operational? I'd need some features right now and not next
>>>> PyCon. Also, am I right that bus factor for this stuff is one?
>>>> --
>>>> anatoly t.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Richard Jones <r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I have merged that PR but I really don't see any point in making any
>>>>> changes
>>>>> to the current codebase beyond fixing significant issues. Cleaning it up
>>>>> is
>>>>> not a priority. I've merged this PR to clean up the PyPI project page on
>>>>> bitbucket a little, but I would ask that no further cosmetic PRs be
>>>>> submitted, thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Warehouse is the name of the next version of PyPI being developed by
>>>>> Donald
>>>>> Stufft.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Richard
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 27 October 2013 17:49, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've heard that there is PyPI 2.0, but I still find current PyPI code
>>>>>> to be very suitable for educational purposes (unlike some complicated
>>>>>> framework based solutions, where much of the stuff is hidden in
>>>>>> internals of external lib abstractions), so I continue to send fixes
>>>>>> to improve code base.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please merge this one.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/pypa/pypi/pull-request/6/remove-unused-templatetoolspy-file/
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> anatoly t.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig


-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20131028/aa4845d2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list