[Distutils] a plea for backward-compatibility / smooth transitions

Marcus Smith qwcode at gmail.com
Mon Jul 29 19:50:07 CEST 2013


On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 29 July 2013 18:01, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
>
>> I think we are going to be in a much better place for all that, but let's
>> not deny the pain involved for *everybody* in getting there.
>>
>
> Agreed. I think the goal is valid, and the approach is fine. But we need
> to do a better job in managing people's expectations. I'd like to see a
> roadmap of the various changes planned, as well as some sort of explanation
> of how each of the changes contributes towards the end goal.
>

Nick said he's planning a roadmap on the new User Guide (in August I think
after vacation), so that's something.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/attachments/20130729/f7ee0abc/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Distutils-SIG mailing list