[Distutils] Proposal for incorporating buildout-versions on buildout (Re: Better version pinning in buildout (buildout-versions))
Alex Clark
aclark at aclark.net
Sat Jan 12 21:42:48 CET 2013
On 2013-01-12 16:18:36 +0000, Jim Fulton said:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> wrote:
> ...
>> I propose that buildout-versions get incorporated into
>> buildout in the following way:
>
> OK, proposal 1 wasn't accepted. Here's another stab:
>
> Proposal 2
> ----------
>
> 1. The ``allow-picked-versions`` option gets a new allowed value of
> ``show``. if there are unpicked versions and this option is set to
> ``show``, then picked/unpinned versions are reported in a way
> suitable for copying into a versions section, presumably with the
> same format used by buildout-versions today.
So the possible values becomes: true, false, show (which is true & verbose)
>
> 2. New buildout option: ``update-versions-file``. This takes a path
> (relative to buildout directory) of a file to update with any
> unpinned versions (in a manner roughly the same as
> buildout-versions does today).
>
> 3. New buildout option: ``python-version`` that restricts the Python
> version, with the same semantics as buildout-version provides now.
>
> 4. Change: develop eggs found in the buildout's develop-eggs directory
> will be used even if their version conflicts with a pinned version.
Did somebody ask for this? I tend to think of develop eggs as "real"
eggs. So if I want to resolve a conflict I'll just edit the develop-egg
(presumably by changing the version of the develop egg in the case of a
non-develop-egg that requires a particular version of a develop egg.)
>
> 5. In buildout 2, The default value of the versions option will be
> "versions", rather than being unset. This will allow users to
> omit::
>
> version = versions
>
> from their buildout section.
\o/
>
> 6. To make it a little easier to supply buildout versions on the
> command line, make buildout the default section for command-line
> options, so::
>
> update-versions-file=versions.cfg
>
> or::
>
> allow-picked-versions=show
>
> would be allowed. (They are rejected now.)
So that means I can pass in foo=bar and it will be applied to the
buildout section? How about allowing parameter/values to be applied to
any section and defaulting to buildout? E.g.:
$ buildout buildout:update-versions-file=versions.cfg
Is this same as:
$ buildout update-versions-file=versions.cfg
But I can also do:
$ buildout foo:bar=baz
To set parameter 'bar' with value 'baz' in section 'foo'. In any event,
proposal 2 sounds "close enough" to me so: +1.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Jim
--
Alex Clark · https://www.gittip.com/aclark4life/
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list