[Distutils] Requirent specifiers specified? :)
Jim Fulton
jim at zope.com
Thu Jun 22 21:20:26 CEST 2006
On Jun 22, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 02:20 PM 6/22/2006 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>> On Jun 22, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>>
>>> I assume you are alluding to what I assume is the case that that
>>> there is an implicit
>>> >-infinity and <infinity, so the above example becomes:
>>
>> No, that can't be right. If that were so, then
>>
>> ==1.2 would be meaningless
>>
>> So I have no idea what you were trying to say.
>
> The infinities are implied only if they are needed to complete a
> pairing with an actual condition.
>
>
>> The more I find out about the specification specification, the
>> less I understand it.
>
> Exactly, so stop trying to understand it, and you'll see how
> obvious it is. :)
Ah, if only it was.
> The implementation scans from left to right until it's *sure* that
> the version is either accepted or rejected. Each condition is a
> point, a bound, or a point and a bound. If the version matches the
> "point" part of condition, it's an exact match and you are *sure*
> of an accept, unless it's a "!=", in which case you're *sure* it's
> a reject.
>
> If the version falls below an upper bound (< or <=), you are also
> *sure* that it's accepted. If it is above an upper bound, it is
> *tentatively* rejected.
So given: >1, <3, >5, <7
You are sure that 4 is accepted?
Given: <2, <5
Is 3 accepted or rejected?
> If the version falls below a lower bound (> or >=), you are *sure*
> that it's rejected. If it is above a lower bound, it is
> *tentatively* accepted.
So given: >1, <3, >5, <7
You are sure that 2 is rejected?
> If you reach the end of the conditions without being "sure" of
> anything, then your most recent tentative acceptance or rejection
> is used.
>
> A simple state machine is used to implement this:
>
> state_machine = {
> # =><
> '<' : '--T',
> '<=': 'T-T',
> '>' : 'F+F',
> '>=': 'T+F',
> '==': 'T..',
> '!=': 'F++',
> }
>
> cmp() is used to determine whether the version is =, >, or < than
> the condition's version, and the appropriate row and column is
> pulled from the above table. "T" means "sure accept", "F" means
> "sure reject", "+" means "tentative accept", and "-" means
> "tentative reject". ("." means "don't care".) The state machine
> simply compares versions until its sure or there are no more to
> compare.
I don't understand the meaning of the values in the dictionary above.
Do the character positions reflect states somehow?
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Distutils-SIG
mailing list