[DB-SIG] Use of record sets

[Federico Di Gregorio]

Scavenging the mail folder uncovered M.-A. Lemburg's letter:

> dtuple.py works with all DB API compliant database interfaces.
> There is really no need to add any such mechanism to the DB API
> spec. itself, since writing wrappers which enable this features
> in one of the possible ways is easy and can be done by the application
> programmer rather than the interface author.

i agree. this (not the fact that i agree ;-) but the fact that exists a
module that works with all DB API compliant drivers) closes the argument.

but, while we are at it, what is the decision procedure for this sig?
i mean, the other argument, the one on typecasting ended with some 
proposals and nothing done? what should we do? should i write a resumee
and thensubmit it as an ufficial addition to the db api? and *how*
do you/we accept stuff like this one? there is a voting procedure? 

ciao,
federico

-- 
Federico Di Gregorio
MIXAD LIVE Chief of Research & Technology              fog@mixadlive.com
Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contact        fog@debian.org
                           Don't dream it. Be it. -- Dr. Frank'n'further