[Cython] [RFE] Add dummy compiler directive decorators for pure python mode

[Robert Bradshaw]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Carlos Pita <carlosjosepita at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Not sure, but would it be desirable for the decorators to be less dummy and
>> > for RuntimeCompiledFunction to take the flags into account when compiling
>> > on the fly?
>>
>> Can you provide a pull request, including tests?
>
> I don't have much time these days but I gave some thoughts to this and I
> would like to hear your opinion about the following proposal before start
> coding:
>
> 1. The compiler-directives, locals, etc. decorators will be less dummy in
> two ways:
>   - They will know how to print a repr of themselves.
>   - They will register themselves under some "private" attribute (say
> _cython_decorators, do you have any preference here?) of the decorated function.
>
> 2. Besides get_body(f), RuntimeCompiledFunction will use a new function
> get_cython_decorators(f), which returns the concatenated repr of the
> registered decorators.
>
> 3. This block of code will be passed as a new argument (say
> cython_decorators) to cython_inline. The module code template will now be:
>
> module_code = """
> %(module_body)s
> %(cimports)s
> %(cython_decorators)s
> def __invoke(%(params)s):
> %(func_body)s
> """
>
> What do you think?

+1