[Cython] any more changes for 0.21?

[Robert Bradshaw]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml at behnel.de> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I think the master branch is good enough for at least a 0.21 alpha. Are
>>>> there any pending changes that should go in before it can be released? Any
>>>> pull requests that should be considered?
>>>
>>> I started some work on support for static methods (for c++ and cdef
>>> classes). I'll see if I can wrap this up and create a pull request.
>>>
>>>> We should get this in, I think:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/284
>>>>
>>>> And the gdb tests are still broken.
>>>>
>>>> Robert, could you take a look through the Sage test failures? Most of them
>>>> might be issues in Sage rather than Cython, but it's better to make sure we
>>>> can either fix or safely ignore them.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'll take a look at those.
>>
>> Not all of them look benign. I'm updating Sage to the latest release
>> and will see what's goin on.
>
> The two remaining cmdline.py tests look inocuous, we should be good on
> that front (though I'll try to get this clean again).

All sage tests are passing now (the weren't Cython issues).

- Robert