[Cython] prange CEP updated

[mark florisson]

On 18 April 2011 16:41, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <d.s.seljebotn at astro.uio.no> wrote:
> Excellent! Sounds great! (as I won't have my laptop for some days I can't
> have a look yet but I will later)
>
> You're right about (the current) buffers and the gil. A testcase explicitly
> for them would be good.
>
> Firstprivate etc: i think it'd be nice myself, but it is probably better to
> take a break from it at this point so that we can think more about that and
> not do anything rash; perhaps open up a specific thread on them and ask for
> more general input. Perhaps you want to take a break or task-switch to
> something else (fused types?) until I can get around to review and merge
> what you have so far? You'll know best what works for you though. If you
> decide to implement explicit threadprivate variables because you've got the
> flow I certainly wom't object myself.
>
 Ok, cool, I'll move on :) I already included a test with a prange and
a numpy buffer with indexing.