[Cryptography-dev] Fernet NG or alternative simple, high-level, encrypted message module?

Simo Sorce simo at redhat.com
Tue Jun 28 14:11:34 EDT 2016


I see no problem matching the license, let's discuss if this merge can
be done and I will change the license as we start working on it for
real.

Simo.

On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 09:19 -0700, Frank Siebenlist wrote:
> Hi Simo - if you could accommodate the jwcrypto-license to match
> pyca/cryptography's... that would be fantastic and generous!!! -
> Thanks, Frank.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Simo Sorce <simo at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 23:51 -0400, Paul Kehrer wrote:
> >> In general I'm in favor of pulling jwcrypto (or something like it)
> >> into cryptography. The obstacles are going to be figuring out the
> >> licensing (cryptography is Apache2/BSD dual licensed and any code
> >> contributed to it needs to be available under those licenses),
> >> discussing what (if any) API changes need to be made to fit in with
> >> the API design of the hazmat layer, and general "make the code style
> >> match cryptography".
> >
> > Jwcrypto author here,
> > from my POV we can discuss license/API/style adjustments needed, just
> > let me know in which form you want to have this discussion.
> >
> > Simo.
> >
> > --
> > Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cryptography-dev mailing list
> > Cryptography-dev at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography-dev mailing list
> Cryptography-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev


-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York



More information about the Cryptography-dev mailing list