[Cryptography-dev] What's in a name?
Paul Kehrer
paul.l.kehrer at gmail.com
Tue May 13 05:01:17 CEST 2014
I do like the idea of making the pyca branding more prominent without necessarily changing the actual library’s name. Does the sentence "Download pyca’s cryptography, which is a library for python cryptography” sound unambiguous and reasonable?
On May 12, 2014 at 10:58:40 PM, Terry Chia (terrycwk1994 at gmail.com) wrote:
I like the cryptography name although I'll be open to changing it. Is
there any suggestions at all currently or is this a vague "we should
change this so people won't get confused" thing? I like the idea of
pushing PyCA more though.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Glyph <glyph at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
> On May 12, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Alex Stapleton <alexs at prol.etari.at> wrote:
>
>> I do quite like the name despite its failings. Maybe we should push the PyCA brand more than the individual packages? It would probably make searching a bit easier.
>
> Would it make sense to then change the headings in the documentation and such to "PyCA's Cryptography Package"?
>
> -g
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography-dev mailing list
> Cryptography-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
_______________________________________________
Cryptography-dev mailing list
Cryptography-dev at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cryptography-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cryptography-dev/attachments/20140512/06990630/attachment.html>
More information about the Cryptography-dev
mailing list