[C++-sig] Instantiating class_<> objects without use of aninterpreter? - Bayesian Filter detected spam

[Podpruzhnikov Yuri]

My decision of this problem is (it may be is not best):


1)Declare all class_<>  only in module definition
(BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(DataTypes){...}):
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(DataTypes)
{
        class_<OneDataType>("OneDataType", init<int>())
                        .def("someFunc", &OneDataType::someFunc);

        class_<SomeFactoryClass, boost::noncopyable>("SomeFactoryClass",
no_init);

        class_<OneFactory, bases<SomeFactoryClass> >("OneFactory")
                        .def("makeSomething",
&OneFactory::makeSomething);
}

2) Write this in all factories next code:
object OneFactory::makeSomething()
{
        return object(OneDataType(42));
}



ATTENTION:
Definition of class_<OneDataType> always must be before create
object(OneDataType(42))

If class_<OneDataType> and function, which create
object(OneDataType(42)), declared in one module - all right
But its declared in different modules - 
	module contain class_<OneDataType>     must be imported before
module contain function, which create object(OneDataType(42))