[C++-sig] Difference between old and new Boost.Python interface.

[Roman Yakovenko]

On 9/27/06, David Abrahams <dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
> "Roman Yakovenko" <roman.yakovenko at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I attached minimal test case that reproduce the problem to the mail.
>
> It's not minimal.  I'm sorry, but I'm extremely pressed for time right
> now.  Could you please make more of an effort to minimize it?  For
> example, you can eliminate all explicit invocation of default
> constructors.  You can also elminate the case that "works" and leave
> only the case that "doesn't work."

I thought that you would like to see the "new" and "old" version. This
is not an urgent
bug, not at all. I just wanted to report it and it's work around.

I attached modified version of the files.

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: operators_ext.cpp
Type: text/x-c++src
Size: 522 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cplusplus-sig/attachments/20060927/4ea566d8/attachment.cpp>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test.py
Type: text/x-python
Size: 127 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/cplusplus-sig/attachments/20060927/4ea566d8/attachment.py>