[C++-sig] void* questions\thoughts

David Abrahams dave at boost-consulting.com
Mon Oct 31 17:28:41 CET 2005


"Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge at nedprod.com> writes:

> Dave, what was the rationale for not supporting void as an opaque 
> type?

I didn't design the opaque types support; I guess nobody considered
void when it was designed.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com




More information about the Cplusplus-sig mailing list