[C++-sig] Wrapping classical C API for python access

[David Abrahams]

Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin at comsoft.de> writes:

>
> But is there a special reason for boost.python to have it's own version of 
> tuple? 

Yes, the same reason it has list and str: they are wrappers for the
correspondingly named built-in Python types.

> Because it's too complicated to make boost.tuple play nice with 
> boost.python? Or are those two tuple implementations totally unrelated?

Yep, unrelated.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com