[C++-sig] Re: Re: implicitly_convertible and char*

[Mike Rovner]

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> I don't really feel competent in this matter, but I believe char
> const* and const char* are two different things. Did you try it with
> "const char*"?

Nope. That's the same (read from right to left).
Different things is ...* const (constant pointer itself).

Mike

PS. only ddd afaik treat them differently ;)