[C++-sig] Boost, Boost.Python and G++ 2.96 on VxWorks

[Greg Copeland]

Ya, that's what I feared.  I've heard (unconfirmed) that one vendor's
2.96 may very well be different from another vendor's 2.96 release.
Your comment seems to confirm it.  

Thanks for speaking up!


Cheers,
 
Greg Copeland
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: c++-sig-bounces at python.org [mailto:c++-sig-bounces at python.org]
On
> Behalf Of Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:24 PM
> To: Development of Python/C++ integration
> Subject: RE: [C++-sig] Boost, Boost.Python and G++ 2.96 on VxWorks
> 
> --- Greg Copeland <GCopeland at efjohnson.com> wrote:
> 
> > What type of problems did you encounter?  Can you describe the types
of
> > "workarounds" that you had to implement?  Did you encounter any
problems
> > using boost/operators.hpp?  Did you get complaints about template
> > default arguments...etc...?
> 
> No, this doesn't ring any bells. The problems I had were much more
subtle.
> 
> I noticed that the gcc 2.96 that comes with Red Hat 7.1 behaves
> differently
> than the gcc 2.96 that comes with Red Hat 7.3. Maybe you have yet
another
> variety that calls itself gcc 2.96?
> 
> Ralf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> _______________________________________________
> C++-sig mailing list
> C++-sig at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig