[C++-sig] Re: Virtual Functions with Default Implementations code sample

[Nicodemus]

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:

>--- Nicodemus <nicodemus at globalite.com.br> wrote:
>  
>
>>>I don't think so; IIRC GCC_XML doesn't give us the declared argument
>>>names (if any).  Nicodemus?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>That's correct, GCCXML doesn't provide this information.
>>    
>>
>
>What a pitty. It is a bit unfortunate that keyword support for wrapped C++
>functions isn't automatic. In practice I tend to help myself with Python
>wrappers for the wrapped C++ functions. Not very elegant. Is there hope that
>GCCXML will provide the declared arguments names at some point in the future?
>

I will ask Brad in the GCCXML list about it.