[C++-sig] Re: Injected constructors

[Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve]

--- David Abrahams <dave at boost-consulting.com> wrote:
> > Another idea: could we expand the init<> interface so that it would
> > accept an optional factory function, allowing the user to write:
> >
> > .def(init<>(x_factory))
> 
> I thought of that; do you think it would be confusing because of the
> <>s?

I like this best if it is a possibility.
Ralf


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com