[C++-sig] Re: Interest in luabind

[Daniel Wallin]

At 22:04 2003-07-01, you wrote:
>[2003-07-01] Daniel Wallin wrote:
>
> >At 00:34 2003-06-29, you wrote:
> >>It sounds like we're converging quite rapidly.  What other
> >>issues do we need to deal with?
> >
> >I don't know. I'm sure more issues will pop up later on though. :)
> >How do we proceed from here?
><snip>
>
>As for the name of the common code, I think there was one previous
>suggestion which I can't remember. But my suggestion is Boost.Tie. It's on
>par with Boost.Bind, but tie is one of the terms used for binding at
>runtime/dynamically. I would assume Boost.Lua would be the conterpart to
>Boost.Python.

I think 'tie' is a bit vague. I don't have any suggestions at the moment 
though.
Also, we would very much like to keep the name 'luabind'.


Daniel Wallin, dalwan01 at student.umu.se