[C++-sig] GNU gettext and "_"
Pearu Peterson
pearu at cens.ioc.ee
Thu Jun 20 15:32:11 CEST 2002
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, David Abrahams wrote:
> I'm working on slicing now and I find myself in need of a way to represent
> x[:y]. This is technically not equivalent to x[0:y] since you can slice on
> any type. "Obviously", the answer is to use
>
> x.slice(_,y)
>
> but I suppose that's going to collide with gettext again.
"Obvious" to me would be to use the same convention as used in Python
slice object, that is,
x[:y] would be x.slice(None,y)
x[:y:] would be x.slice(None,y,None)
etc.
> I suppose we could check "#if defined(_)" and supply some other symbol for
> those people who need gettext compatibility.
-1. It would mean that there will be two groups of BPL users who cannot
use each other codes, very roughly speaking.
Pearu
More information about the Cplusplus-sig
mailing list