[C++-sig] Re: Re: sub module support in V2

[David Abrahams]

From: "Dave Hawkes" <daveh at cadlink.com>

> ie
>
>     class_(class_<...>& c);
>
> Of course this will look like a duck, walk like a duck and bark like a
> dog...

Why?
It doesn't match the regular copy-constructor, if that's what you're
worried about.

> This probably means putting in some superfluous argument so it doesn't
look
> like a copy constrctor.

Are you just concerned that people will be confused?