[C++-sig] to_python_converter and object

[David Abrahams]

Sorry I never answered this one. The low-level conversion mechanisms are
likely to continue to traffic in raw PyObject*s, at least for a while. I'm
trying to avoid imposing unneccessary overheads (mostly in code size), but
since I've never measured it I'd be willing to entertain a change...

-Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hawkes" <daveh at cadlink.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.c++
To: <c++-sig at python.org>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:34 AM
Subject: [C++-sig] to_python_converter and object


> I was about to do some testing that involved using to_python_converter
and
> noticed that there does not appear to be direct support for a convert
> function that returns an object instead of a PyObject*, is this something
> that is likely to be changed?
>
> Thanks
> Dave Hawkes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> C++-sig mailing list
> C++-sig at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/c++-sig