[C++-sig] multiply defined to_python_converter

[David Abrahams]

"Langston, Matthew David" <langston at SLAC.Stanford.EDU> writes:

> I'm not sure I understood the case for why two extension modules
> need separate copies of a static member of a class template. Is this
> an intenal Boost.Python implementation issue that is required to
> implement your three-point plan above? 

Yes.

>  Or, does it relate to user-written to_python_converters?

Not really.

> Based on my use-case, the solution you and Ralf came up with
> completely solves my problem. So, how does it sound? Sounds perfect
> to me.

Good to know.  FWIW, it doesn't solve the compiler interoperability
problem.  I'm not sure what the best answer for that would be.

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave at boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution