[core-workflow] Questions about the proposed workflow

[Brett Cannon]

This line of argument about what GitHub *might *do if they run out of money
is not persuading me in the slightest, so I consider this line of argument
closed.

On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 at 11:07 Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:

> Reminder that Github existed many years before they took outside
> investments and they were successful and profitable long before they did.
> They took investment to expand an already profitable company into
> enterprise, not to cover expenses while they figured out how to make money.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 12, 2015, at 1:17 PM, Stefan Krah <skrah.temporarily at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Only in the abstract.  GitHub has an reported investment of 350.000.000,
> > while GitLab only has a very small fraction of that.  If selling private
> > repos doesn't justify that kind of money, it's pretty clear what will
> > happen!
> _______________________________________________
> core-workflow mailing list
> core-workflow at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
> This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
> https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20151212/5696a706/attachment-0001.html>