[core-workflow] tracker 'resolution'

[Nick Coghlan]

On 19 Apr 2014 06:04, "Antoine Pitrou" <antoine at python.org> wrote:
>
> On ven., 2014-04-18 at 22:59 -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> > I would like to collapse and reorder this list as follows:
> >
> >     duplicate
> >     not a bug
> >     works for me
> >     fixed
> >     postponed
> >     won't fix
> >     3rd party
>
> Is "3rd party" a different thing from "not a bug". Often it's "not a
> bug" because it's a bug somewhere else (perhaps not identified :-)).

That would be the resolution used for things like bugs in pip, or errors in
a patched distro version. Ideally it would require a URL that referenced
the bug in the other projects issue tracker, but that can go in a comment
easily enough.

Cheers,
Nick.

>
> Regardless, +1.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> core-workflow mailing list
> core-workflow at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
> This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/attachments/20140419/588cc11b/attachment.html>