[Chicago] Quick Poll: what editor or IDE do you use?

Shawn Carroll shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 23:30:02 CEST 2014


Eclipse and vi


shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Software Engineer
Soccer Referee

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:27 PM, DiPierro, Massimo <MDiPierro at cs.depaul.edu>
wrote:

> emacs. Always emacs. Only emacs.
>
> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Adam Cezar Jenkins <emperorcezar at gmail.com
> <mailto:emperorcezar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Was Emacs, now PyCharm with license. Couldn't be happier.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Father, dabbling at being a Python developer specializing in Django,
> Cyclist, and home brewer.
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Brian Ray <brianhray at gmail.com<mailto:
> brianhray at gmail.com>> wrote:
> vim
> emacs
> sublime text
> Eclipse
> gedit
> kdevelop
> komodo
> netbeans
> PyCharm
> BBedit
> Coda
> ItelliJ IDEA
> ... list (other)
>
> I am doing research for my talk tomorrow. Thanks!
>
> --
> Brian Ray
> @brianray
> (773) 669-7717<tel:%28773%29%20669-7717>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org<mailto:Chicago at python.org>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org<mailto:Chicago at python.org>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20141008/8eda4845/attachment.html>


More information about the Chicago mailing list