[Chicago] meeting where?

Frank Duncan herbieman2000 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 21:47:15 CET 2010


Cool, done.

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Christopher Allan Webber <
cwebber at dustycloud.org> wrote:

> Do Common Lisp also.  They're pretty different, and it would be nice to
> evaluate how they are different.
>
> Also, I don't know emacs lisp *that* well :)
>
> Frank Duncan <herbieman2000 at gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tWDOaOr7_kqB-yVgfQPRh7w&single=true&gid=0&output=html
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Garrett Smith <g at rre.tt> wrote:
> >
> >     Is there a link to the current signup list?
> >
> >     On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Frank Duncan <
> herbieman2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >     > I can do Common Lisp, but I see Webber is doing Emacs Lisp
> already.  I don't
> >     > know if you guys are willing to put up with an overabundance of
> parens, so
> >     > maybe not a good idea?  I guess it depends on what Chris's talk is
> goign to
> >     > focus on, but I'd be heavy on meta programming and macros.  If he's
> planning
> >     > the same, then I'll just let him do it :)
> >     >
> >     > Frank
> >     >
> >     > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Garrett Smith <g at rre.tt> wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >> I think in deference to anyone's who's presenting who can't make
> it
> >     >> next month, we should keep it as is, no matter how tentative. But
> it
> >     >> would be nice to have more than five presentations.
> >     >>
> >     >> If we're stuck with five, we could allow presenters, at their
> >     >> discretion, to present more content/go longer. No sense insisting
> on a
> >     >> lightning format, IMO.
> >     >>
> >     >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:18 AM, sheila miguez <shekay at pobox.com>
> wrote:
> >     >> > Yes, I'd like a better number. We can reach everyone on the list
> to
> >     >> > warn them that the tentative date was too tentative.
> >     >> >
> >     >> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Garrett Smith <g at rre.tt>
> wrote:
> >     >> >> 5 or so might be a good argument for bumping to next month so
> we can
> >     >> >> get a better number. I think last time we have well over ten.
> >     >> >>
> >     >> >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Carl Karsten <
> cfkarsten at gmail.com>
> >     >> >> wrote:
> >     >> >>> I hear we have 5 or so people signed up to do language things,
> so we
> >     >> >>> go with that.
> >     >> >>>
> >     >> >>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Garrett Smith <g at rre.tt>
> wrote:
> >     >> >>>> Are we still doing the language beatbox rap contest?
> >     >> >>>>
> >     >> >>>> I did like Pete's suggestion of a show-and-tell from PyCon.
> The
> >     >> >>>> multi-language thing's something we can always do.
> >     >> >>>>
> >     >> >>>> Garrett
> >     >> >>>>
> >     >> >>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Carl Karsten <
> carl at personnelware.com>
> >     >> >>>> wrote:
> >     >> >>>>> We currently have no place to meet.
> >     >> >>>>>
> >     >> >>>>> If no one comes up with anything today, I'll book Sully's.
> >     >> >>>>>
> >     >> >>>>> I am putting us on ITA's calendar for April.
> >     >> >>>>>
> >     >> >>>>> --
> >     >> >>>>> Carl K
> >     >> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >     >> >>>>> Chicago mailing list
> >     >> >>>>> Chicago at python.org
> >     >> >>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >     >> >>>>>
> >     >> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >     >> >>>> Chicago mailing list
> >     >> >>>> Chicago at python.org
> >     >> >>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >     >> >>>>
> >     >> >>>
> >     >> >>>
> >     >> >>>
> >     >> >>> --
> >     >> >>> Carl K
> >     >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >     >> >>> Chicago mailing list
> >     >> >>> Chicago at python.org
> >     >> >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >     >> >>>
> >     >> >> _______________________________________________
> >     >> >> Chicago mailing list
> >     >> >> Chicago at python.org
> >     >> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >     >> >>
> >     >> >
> >     >> >
> >     >> >
> >     >> > --
> >     >> > sheila
> >     >> > _______________________________________________
> >     >> > Chicago mailing list
> >     >> > Chicago at python.org
> >     >> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >     >> >
> >     >> _______________________________________________
> >     >> Chicago mailing list
> >     >> Chicago at python.org
> >     >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Chicago mailing list
> >     > Chicago at python.org
> >     > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >     >
> >     >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Chicago mailing list
> >     Chicago at python.org
> >     http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chicago mailing list
> > Chicago at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/chicago/attachments/20100308/dfc7565b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Chicago mailing list