[Chicago] Python Code Beautifiers
Samir Faci
spam at esamir.com
Tue Nov 11 21:08:27 CET 2008
Free or open source?
Let's get RMS into this debate.. I'm sure he appreciates a good scotch too.
Garrett Smith wrote:
> "'Free' as in free scotch"??
>
> That just might stick!
>
>
> ----- "Kumar McMillan" <kumar.mcmillan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Samir Faci <spam at esamir.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hmmmm, is he? That really is good to know, though the next question
>>>
>> is...
>>
>>> is he scriptable? can kumar be executed as a cron job given beer
>>>
>> is piped
>>
>>> in as stdin. :P
>>>
>> might work with scotch or whiskey
>>
>>
>>> I was gonna answer to that email, but that reply is probably gonna
>>>
>> be a bit
>>
>>> more long winded, I'll send that out when I get home.
>>>
>>> Okay, pylint is very sweet. I like the output and all the details,
>>>
>> but
>>
>>> unless I'm missing something, it's simply a code analyzer, it
>>>
>> doesn't
>>
>>> actually modify the code.
>>> I was looking for something that given a certain config would alter
>>>
>> or
>>
>>> generate a copy of my code with the modification passed in via the
>>>
>> config
>>
>>> file. I believe both PyChecker and pylint are just a validation
>>>
>> tool to
>>
>>> ensure that your code is decent.
>>> --
>>> Samir
>>>
>>>
>>> Garrett Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> Samir,
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Kumar -- *he* is an excellent code beautifier. I
>>>>
>> believe he
>>
>>>> is available under one of the "free beer" licenses.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>>
>>>> ----- "Kumar McMillan" <kumar.mcmillan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Samir.
>>>>>
>>>>> while beautifiers are important for C-like languages (java, php,
>>>>> perl,
>>>>> etc) I think you'll find that after working in Python they are not
>>>>>
>> so
>>
>>>>> important. This is mainly because indentation is forced upon you.
>>>>>
>> In
>>
>>>>> my experience, using a code formatter is important when rogue
>>>>>
>> editors
>>
>>>>> mess up indentation (some emacs modes do this). Since this
>>>>>
>> results
>>
>>>>> in
>>>>> an immediate syntax error in python, it's not something to worry
>>>>> about.
>>>>>
>>>>> Using a beautifier is also important when there is a lack of
>>>>> discipline on a team but obviously then you have a bigger problem.
>>>>>
>> If
>>
>>>>> you are on a team where you feel the need to run everything
>>>>>
>> through a
>>
>>>>> code formatter I'd suggest instead to try requiring code reviews
>>>>> before a developer can check in his/her code to trunk.
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review
>>>>> A quick code review will often catch most formatting mistakes
>>>>>
>> (and
>>
>>>>> laziness, like lines greater than 80 chars). A code review is
>>>>>
>> also a
>>
>>>>> psychological device that makes devs try harder to make things
>>>>> readable by other devs :)
>>>>>
>>>>> It also helps a team to agree on some conventions for your team
>>>>>
>> to
>>
>>>>> follow. I.E. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Samir Faci
>>>>>
>> <samir.list at gmail.com>
>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been sort of lurking around for a while, and just started
>>>>>>
>> to
>>
>>>>> get a
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> bit more active with python. Now, I know that python is just
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> beautiful and
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> we all love how pretty it looks, especially compared to some
>>>>>>
>> other
>>
>>>>> languages
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> *cough* perl *cough*. That being said, I was wondering if
>>>>>>
>> anyone
>>
>>>>> knew of
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> any code beautifiers for python.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The ones I've been able to find have limited functionality. ie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> reindent.py
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> to fix your tabbing, and PythonTidy which I think may do what I
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> want, but
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> for some reason has no config file, aside from editing the .py
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> file.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just looking for something like uncrustify for c++/java, where I
>>>>>>
>> can
>>
>>>>> specify
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> a format, as far as how I want my function definitions to look
>>>>>>
>> like,
>>
>>>>> my if,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> else, etc to look like and allow my beautifier to traverse a list
>>>>>>
>> of
>>
>>>>> .py
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> files and generate a prettier version of the .py file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any suggestions would be appreciated, if anyone has used any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Samir
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chicago mailing list
>>>> Chicago at python.org
>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chicago mailing list
>>> Chicago at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago mailing list
>> Chicago at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago mailing list
> Chicago at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago
>
More information about the Chicago
mailing list