[Chicago] requirements tracking in python
Pete
pfein at pobox.com
Thu Jan 24 18:08:50 CET 2008
On Thursday January 24 2008 11:32:10 am Chris McAvoy wrote:
> Trac is pretty great. You can get creative with tickets. In general
> though, it sounds like your whole crew needs to evaluate your
> development methodologies...figure out what works, and stick with
> it. That usually requires a bunch of buy in from a bunch of people
> who don't like to buy in, but if you get it all lined up, it might
> make things easier than finding a magical software package that fixes
> everything.
Lemme 2nd trac... we use it for basically everything. I think we average
around a 1000 tickets per year. For a ~5 person company. Since we don't
have a physical office, our requirements/design discussions happen on the
tickets (though we do discuss on IM sometimes & summarize on the ticket).
It's nice having the entire context of a SVN change is in one place. Though
sometimes finding what you're looking for is a little hard, and it's no
substitute for the high-level overview wiki documentation gives.
Though as Chris mentions, this is kinda getting more into methodology than
tools.
On that note, do people really work off pre-defined specs? We find that we
start out with a rough idea of what we're trying to do and refine the *idea*
as we implement. In software, I find it's hard to know what you want until
you're halfway there. IMO, that's little-a agile.
Again, it's a culture thing. Though one of my coworkers used to print out
circuit diagrams on a large format printer and hang them on the wall for the
benefit of the managers at his previous job. YMMV.
--
Peter Fein || 773-575-0694 || pfein at pobox.com
http://www.pobox.com/~pfein/ || PGP: 0xCCF6AE6B
irc: pfein at freenode.net || jabber: peter.fein at gmail.com
More information about the Chicago
mailing list