[Chicago] Sprint, Imagescape
Ian Bicking
ianb at colorstudy.com
Tue Mar 14 22:10:22 CET 2006
Andrew Dudzik wrote:
> On 3/14/06, *Atul Varma* <varmaa at gmail.com <mailto:varmaa at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> CVS just plain sucks compared to its competition
>
>
> Allow me to introduce you to a little program called VSS...
I think the better statement would be that CVS compares to SVN, and
mostly sucks compared to the new generation of distributed VC systems --
but it's really easy to compare CVS to SVN, and not as easy to compare
to the other systems (the distributed-vs-centralized debate is seperate
from the quality-of-tool debate).
But notably every new generation of systems works from the CVS *model*
as a basis. SVN copies is very closely. Distributed systems change it,
but use CVS as their point of reference for changes. And all those
other proprietary systems are just dead ends. (Except probably
BitKeeper, which has been very influential)
--
Ian Bicking / ianb at colorstudy.com / http://blog.ianbicking.org
More information about the Chicago
mailing list