[Catalog-sig] trove - LGPL v3 not recognised?

[Robert Collins]

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Robert Collins
<robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> These are the ones I would like to see:
>
>> >License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Lesser General Public License v2 (LGPLv2)
>> >License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Lesser General Public License v3 (LGPLv3)
>> >License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Lesser General Public License v2 or later (LGPLv2+)
>> >License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Lesser General Public License v3 or later (LGPLv3+)
>> >License :: OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License v2 (GPLv2)
>> >License :: OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License v3 (GPLv3)
>> >License :: OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License v2 or later (GPLv2+)
>> >License :: OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License v3 or later (GPLv3+)
>
> Doing a 4th level would raise a bunch of interactions between legal
> intent  - the above list seems like a good compromise. We've just had
> a user turn up confused around this again, so - do we have sufficient
> consensus to add these?
>
> -Rob

Ping? I'm not sure how to check if these were added or not ?

-Rob