[Catalog-sig] egg_info in PyPI

["Martin v. Löwis"]

> I think most of the response was targeted at the EGG-INFO
> meta-data format, not the information itself.

My impression was otherwise: several posters clearly indicated
that they don't want exposition of this information (in whatever
form), as they expected it would hinder adoption of PEP 345.

> If you look at the above mess of upper- and lower-case filenames,
> files which only serve as marker and others having actual
> content, different content types, etc. I think it's clear
> that using this particular format is not a good idea.
> 
> We can do better :-)

Unfortunately, it seems, not with the data available.

Regards,
Martin