[Catalog-sig] Mercurial

Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Jun 16 20:41:55 CEST 2010


Le mercredi 16 juin 2010 à 20:40 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit :
> Am 16.06.2010 13:44, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> > Martin v. Löwis<martin<at>  v.loewis.de>  writes:
> >>
> >>> As a maintainer of the PyPI project, it makes your workflow simpler,
> >>>
> >>> - contributors can clone the repo, change the code and ask you for a pull
> >>> - you can pull changes by direct hg commands, and merge them
> >>
> >> After using Mercurial in one project, I'm skeptical that this really
> >> makes things simpler. I find it very hard to find out what changes a
> >> specific clone has that I still need to integrate. Also, when merging
> >> with conflicts, I find it very difficult to determine whether I merged
> >> all the conflicts correctly (since the diff will show all changes, not
> >> just the conflicts).
> >>
> >> So I rather expect things to become more difficult when switching to hg.
> >
> > I think it would be fair to bring those points on the mercurial mailing-list.
> > After all we'll be one of their "high-profile" users, so they'd probably like us
> > to enjoy the experience.
> 
> I'm just a hg beginner, so it's probably all my fault, and I'm not using 
> it correctly.

There's no problem in asking beginner questions :)

Regards

Antoine.




More information about the Catalog-SIG mailing list