[Catalog-sig] [Distutils] Metadata-Version in PKG-INFO

[René Dudfield]

hellos,

Is it just me, or are these classifiers not as good as tags?

Should people really have to discuss and get approved what tags they put on
their software?

Seems like a big waste of everyones time, and doesn't result in as good a
database.

cheers,


2009/4/17 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com>

> 2009/4/16 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de>:
> >> I don't see it in the list (just LGPL without any version detail), I
> >> am ccing this request to catalog-sig so
> >> they can add it if they think it's wise
> >
> > How should this be done? As a separate classifier with the suffix v3,
> > or as a subclassifier of LGPL?
> >
>
> Looking at others (Mozilla Public License) I would go for a separate
> one with the suffix.
>
> But what about LGPL 2 and 2.1 (It seems that 2.1 is introduces a lot
> of changes) ?
>
> Maybe "LGPL2+" would be better for the 2.x series (and maybe 2+ includes v3
> ?)
>
> Maybe we could ask someone at the FSF so we have the best versions in
> our Trove classifier.
>
> Regards
> Tarek
>
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
> _______________________________________________
> Catalog-SIG mailing list
> Catalog-SIG at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20090417/d7d3bac1/attachment.htm>