[Borgbackup] Storage, CPU, RAM comparisons

Dmitry Astapov dastapov at gmail.com
Mon May 4 12:51:58 EDT 2020


Repo claims that it tested  "1.1.0beta6", which was well after the
fork/rename.

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:48 PM Alberto Luaces <
borgbackup at aluaces.fastmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 4, 2020, at 11:54, Dmitry Astapov wrote:
>
> If you clone the repo and try to run the test yourself, you will find that
> it tries to run a binary called "attic", not "borg".
> So the author chose to rename "borg" to "attic" because ... why exactly?
>
> Initially it was a fork, so they could not be named identically.
> _______________________________________________
> Borgbackup mailing list
> Borgbackup at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/borgbackup
>


-- 
D. Astapov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/borgbackup/attachments/20200504/5918598a/attachment.html>


More information about the Borgbackup mailing list