[Baypiggies] Possible future meeting topic

jim jim at well.com
Fri Oct 17 22:43:18 CEST 2008


   seem okay to include in our acceptable tools 
list those tools that are adjuncts to a particular 
editor. 


On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 13:23 -0700, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:50 AM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
>         
>           i love this idea. let's set it up for 2009Q1.
>           seems like multiple speakers sharing their
>         favorite tools is a good idea.
>           what's the diff between an IDE and an editing
>         program? not much, seems to me, both represent a
>         commitment to a restricted, extended tool set, yes?
>           there are good coders using really crude tools,
>         which may provide a broader, or at least different,
>         tool set. i'd say editors and IDEs are not tools,
>         for our purposes, but it'd be okay to present
>         favorite tools that may integrate only with some
>         editor or IDE.
>           what say?
>         
> 
> We had an editors night before, and it wasn't bad.  I think we should
> have an editors night separate of the other tools, otherwise the scope
> of the night is to broad.
> 
> -jj
> 
> 
> -- 
> Making something complex is simple.
> Making something simple is complex.
> http://jjinux.blogspot.com/
> 



More information about the Baypiggies mailing list