[Baypiggies] Possible future meeting topic
jim
jim at well.com
Fri Oct 17 22:43:18 CEST 2008
seem okay to include in our acceptable tools
list those tools that are adjuncts to a particular
editor.
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 13:23 -0700, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:50 AM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
>
> i love this idea. let's set it up for 2009Q1.
> seems like multiple speakers sharing their
> favorite tools is a good idea.
> what's the diff between an IDE and an editing
> program? not much, seems to me, both represent a
> commitment to a restricted, extended tool set, yes?
> there are good coders using really crude tools,
> which may provide a broader, or at least different,
> tool set. i'd say editors and IDEs are not tools,
> for our purposes, but it'd be okay to present
> favorite tools that may integrate only with some
> editor or IDE.
> what say?
>
>
> We had an editors night before, and it wasn't bad. I think we should
> have an editors night separate of the other tools, otherwise the scope
> of the night is to broad.
>
> -jj
>
>
> --
> Making something complex is simple.
> Making something simple is complex.
> http://jjinux.blogspot.com/
>
More information about the Baypiggies
mailing list