[BangPypers] Simple python database library

[Dhananjay Nene]

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:59 PM, steve <steve at lonetwin.net> wrote:

>
>>
>  I personally prefer SQLObject because it comes across as being more
> pythonic than SQLAlchemy, of course YMMV.
>
> Quite likely .. but it doesn't try to be pythonic, its focused more on
staying consistent with its relational underpinnings. A ^C^V from the
documentation -

DBA Approved

Built to conform to what DBAs demand, including the ability to swap out
generated SQL with hand-optimized statements, full usage of bind parameters
for all literal values, fully transactionalized and batched database writes
using the Unit of Work pattern. All object-relational patterns are designed
around the usage of proper referential integrity, and foreign keys are an
integral part of its usage.
Non-Opinionated

SQLAlchemy places the highest value on not getting in the way of database
and application architecture. Unlike many tools, it *never* "generates"
schemas (not to be confused with issuing user-defined
DDL<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Definition_Language>,
in which it excels) or relies on naming conventions of any kind. SQLAlchemy
supports the widest variety of database and architectural designs as is
reasonably possible.


>
> cheers,
> - steve
> --
> random non tech spiel: http://lonetwin.blogspot.com/
> tech randomness: http://lonehacks.blogspot.com/
> what i'm stumbling into: http://lonetwin.stumbleupon.com/
> _______________________________________________
> BangPypers mailing list
> BangPypers at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
>



-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
blog: http://blog.dhananjaynene.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/dnene http://twitter.com/_pythonic