➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2003-10-08 19:52 by gminick, last changed 2022-04-10 16:11 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| py-2.3.2-contains.patch | gminick, 2003-10-08 19:52 | Patch changing obj.__contains__() to return True/False. | ||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg44749 - (view) | Author: Wojtek Walczak (gminick) | Date: 2003-10-08 19:52 | |
shouldn't it return True/False?
examples:
>>> a = 'python'
>>> a.__contains__('perl')
0
>>> a.__contains__('python')
1
>>> a = { 'python' : 1, 'ruby' : 1 }
>>> a.__contains__('perl')
0
>>> a.__contains__('python')
1
>>>
instead of:
>>> a = 'python'
>>> a.__contains__('perl')
False
>>> a.__contains__('python')
True
>>> a = { 'python' : 1, 'ruby' : 1 }
>>> a.__contains__('perl')
False
>>> a.__contains__('python')
True
>>>
The reason for asking is that i.e. obj.__eq__() returns True/False,
and besides True/False looks nicer than 1/0 ;>
|
|||
| msg44750 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) *  |
Date: 2003-10-08 20:12 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=6380 Looks good, I'll check this in. |
|||
| msg44751 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * |
Date: 2003-10-08 21:09 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=6380 Thanks, checked in! |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:11:40 | admin | set | github: 39385 |
| 2003-10-08 19:52:36 | gminick | create | |