➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2003-07-16 04:13 by tim1470, last changed 2022-04-10 16:09 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| setup.py.patch | tim1470, 2003-07-16 04:13 | use -lcursses if needed for readline | ||
| setup.py.patch2 | akuchling, 2003-09-25 17:52 | Add /usr/ccs/lib on Unixware as well as OSF/1 | ||
| setup.py.patch3 | tim1470, 2003-09-25 20:02 | corrections to patch2 and added openuninx8 | ||
| setup.py.patch4 | akuchling, 2003-10-24 12:11 | Add only unixware7 and openunix8 | ||
| Messages (8) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg44283 - (view) | Author: Tim Rice (tim1470) | Date: 2003-07-16 04:13 | |
On UnixWare platforms readline module doesn't build because it needs -lcurses. Here is a patch that corrects this. This should also be applied to the 2.2 tree. here is the error. *** WARNING: renaming "readline" since importing it failed: dynamic linker: ./python: relocation error: symbol not found: tputs; referenced from: /usr/local/lib/libreadline.so.3 |
|||
| msg44284 - (view) | Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) *  |
Date: 2003-09-25 17:52 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=11375 There's already an earlier bit of code that adds /usr/ccs/lib on OSF/1, so maybe it's better to just add Unixware to that test. Does the new attached patch work for you? |
|||
| msg44285 - (view) | Author: Tim Rice (tim1470) | Date: 2003-09-25 20:02 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=618097 patch2 doesn't quite worlk but it's on the right track I've attached setup.py.patch3 that does work. |
|||
| msg44286 - (view) | Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) * |
Date: 2003-10-23 12:15 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=11375 Question: why does the second test use 'unixware' and 'openunix8', while the first test uses only 'unixware'? |
|||
| msg44287 - (view) | Author: Tim Rice (tim1470) | Date: 2003-10-23 21:38 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=618097 sys.platform returns unixware7 so I added ther first test. The OpenUNIX product name has been dropped in favor of UnixWare again. So I don't expect any other openunixN Now I can't remember why I added the first hunk instead of just the second hunk with s/unixware/unixware7/ |
|||
| msg44288 - (view) | Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) * |
Date: 2003-10-24 12:11 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=11375 So does the attached patch work? It just checks for openunix8 or unixware7. |
|||
| msg44289 - (view) | Author: Tim Rice (tim1470) | Date: 2003-10-24 18:21 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=618097 Yes it works fine. |
|||
| msg44290 - (view) | Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) * |
Date: 2003-10-24 18:26 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=11375 Applied (finally :) ) as rev. 1.175 of setup.py; thanks! |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:09:59 | admin | set | github: 38858 |
| 2003-07-16 04:13:08 | tim1470 | create | |