Re: Why don't stringobjects have methods?
Tim Peters (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Fri, 01 Apr 94 15:10:26 EST
> ... Hence for an *arbitrary* function,
> f(x) and None
> won't always go printless :-(.
[f(x)] and None
briefly y'rs - tim
Tim Peters email@example.com
not speaking for Kendall Square Research Corp