Mike Brown <mike@skew.org> writes: > Sorta. UCS-4 is more than just a "code set" though. And IIRC there > was some debate over whether UTF-32 fit the definition of being a > true UTF. If you're going to get into that level of understanding, > carefully read the following: I think the answer also somewhat varies depending on whether you read Unicode or ISO 10646. Regards, Martin