[XML-SIG] Metadata in XBEL

[Fred L. Drake, Jr.]

Martin v. Loewis writes:
 > So I'd reverse my previous comment: *If* a 1.1 release of XBEL is
 > issued for good reasons, it should probably show ANY as the element
 > contents, to avoid confusion; and the documentation should be clear
 > that any well-formed element (plus text) is accepted as contents

  Agreed; I've made this change in my tentative 1.1 DTD and
documentation.

 > None specifically. I was suggesting that any missing features that
 > came up during in the Galeon project should be worth consideration.

  Sounds good.  Ross, David: please speak up if you have any
additional considerations for us!


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Digital Creations