[XML-SIG] How to proceed

[uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com]

> * uche ogbuji
> | 
> | This has my vote, easily.
> 
> What has?  I was asking where you (and the others) think development
> should happen, in the XML-SIG, as separate projects on SourceForge or
> privately (as has been done so far).  

Ah, I hadn't enough sleep when I responded.

> All your email told me was that you have some opinion about xmlproc,
> but I haven't a clue what it was.  :-)

I meant that I would much prefer to see development on xmlproc.  In answer to 
your real question, though, I think they might as well all go on Sourceforge 
sonmce it will give others a chance to pitch in.  (I would have considered 
"others pitching in" a remote contingency until recently when Martin stepped 
in and pretty much saved the XML-SIG).


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python