[XML-SIG] PyDoc/XML?
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:32:18 -0400
> >>The Python community will one day have its own package used for the
> ......>
> >Here is what we've very tentatively set up for FourThought:
<DTD and XSL snipped>
> >
> >What does everyone think? Could we hack the hell out of it on this list and
> >adopt it for standard Python docs.
> I'm just eavesdropping on your conversation, trying to understand how
> this would work. If I understand correctly you're proposing an 'autoDoc'
> facility for Python along the lines of JavaDocs. But I don't see how XML
> is used to mark-up the Python source code. Is that included in your idea?
I was not yet proposing a mechanism for generating Python docs, just a format
for the eventual stand-alone docs. I personally don't like the current vogue
in document/code fusion. Yes, I like modules to be self-documenting and all
that, but I've found having large swathes of high-level docs scattered about a
module to be a tremendous hindrance.
I think that in this connected Internet world, it's better to simply link from
the module to on-line docs. Yes this is not ideal, what if there are network
problems, etc. but it's the trade-off I prefer.
FourThought currently uses the separate-but-linked module doc approach, and we
use the DTD abd Stylesheet I presented. As we develop our XLink tools, we
have even cooler ideas for integrating code and docs, but once again, right
now all I'm trying to do is propose a format.
If we can agree on a format, then the auto-doc folks can generate the XML from
their doc-strings in a similar approach to Javadoc, and others can simply
enter the docs directly into Web- or command-line tools.
> In other words, is it possible to use XML as a markup language inside the
> comments of another language etc. I seem to recall that this is done in
> SGML but haven't heard of it in XML.
Where's the technical problem?
#!/usr/bin/python
"""
<module name='foo'>
<description>A collection of k-RAD routines for the very 3733T</description>
</module>
"""
class bar:
"""
<class name='bar'>
<description>A class all on its own</description>
</class>
"""
def __init__():
etc.
I don't recommend it: it is cluttered, which is why I advocate
separate-but-linked docs, but it's perfectly legal, and it wouldn't be
terribly difficult to write a script that extracts pure XML from it.
--
Uche Ogbuji
FourThought LLC, IT Consultants
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com (970)481-0805
Software engineering, project management, Intranets and Extranets
http://FourThought.com http://OpenTechnology.org