[XML-SIG] qp API

[Fred L. Drake]

Paul Prescod writes:
 > If we take out parent and sibling pointers, I see know reason that a DOM
 > implementation should be more than a few percent slower than qp_xml. In

  I'd like to see the parent pointer kept, but I'm also fine with an
explicit destroy() or close() method instead of those damnable
proxies.
  I haven't actually needed sibling pointers, so I'm not sure I care
about them.  They can be computed easily enough if someone wants the
data on an "occaisional" basis.


  -Fred

--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.	     <fdrake@acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives