[Web-SIG] Changes for WSGI 1.1

Cory Benfield cory at lukasa.co.uk
Thu Feb 18 03:05:41 EST 2016


Yeah, the directionality needs to be specified more clearly here. Thanks!

Cory

> On 17 Feb 2016, at 17:55, Michael Merickel <mmericke at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure the "backward-incompatible" text in your proposal makes sense. I think you actually mean to say that applications written to use new WSGI 1.1 features will not work with WSGI 1.0 servers. That's obvious though by the version number bump. I'd be very concerned, however, if my application using only WSGI 1.0 features didn't work on a WSGI 1.1 server (which is what I thought you were saying the first time I saw backward-incompatible in the text).
> 
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl <mailto:dirkjan at ochtman.nl>> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Cory Benfield <cory at lukasa.co.uk <mailto:cory at lukasa.co.uk>> wrote:
> > Please let me know what you think!
> 
> I reviewed all the pull requests and they look good to me, save one
> tiny nit that I left a comment for.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dirkjan
> _______________________________________________
> Web-SIG mailing list
> Web-SIG at python.org <mailto:Web-SIG at python.org>
> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig <http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig>
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/mmericke%2Bwebsig%40gmail.com <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/mmericke%2Bwebsig%40gmail.com>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/attachments/20160218/c9f54ace/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/attachments/20160218/c9f54ace/attachment.sig>


More information about the Web-SIG mailing list