[Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

[est]

> nodejs cluster looks no more than a simple master + workers
model

Yes, NodeJS cluster is simple, But IMHO it's the gravity which unifies the
Nodejs ecosystem. While in Python world we only have WSGI and everyone else
has its own cluster model. (Please correct me if I am wrong!)

btw uWSGI is awesome with its RPC capabilities thanks for all the work!

> If you crosslink the Flask app object and the WebSocket factory with
each other you can shuffle data in both directions.

That's super cool. Thanks!

What I propose is officially Python endorsed cluster standard. Am I over
thinking this? Or the status quo is good enough for everyone else?



On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Tobias Oberstein <
tobias.oberstein at gmail.com> wrote:

> Chris Withers <chris at ...> writes:
>
> >
> > On 18/03/2014 12:37, exarkun at ... wrote:
> > >> Twisted Web is cool, but there's it's not as interchangeable as WSGI.
> > >
> > > Twisted Web includes a WSGI container.  You can run any WSGI
> application
> > > in it.
> >
> > How easy is it to get messages from a twisted-run websocket (say
> > autobahn) into and from a wsgi app?
>
> Here is how you run Twisted Web + WSGI container + Flask + Autobahn
> all on 1
> port:
>
> https://github.com/tavendo/AutobahnPython/
> blob/master/examples/twisted/websocket/echo_wsgi/server.py
>
> If you crosslink the Flask app object and the WebSocket factory with
> each other you can shuffle data in both directions.
>
> /Tobias
>
> >
> > (I'm not sure my question makes 100% sense, but thought I'd throw it out
> > there anyway...)
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web-SIG mailing list
> Web-SIG at python.org
> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/electronixtar%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/attachments/20140319/92a5f783/attachment.html>